Computers are being used more and more in education and some say there will be no role in education for teachers.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?======================================================
In the true that, learning via technology is increasing rapidly in the classrooms therefore few individuals opine that there tutors will not require for learning. I am strongly disagree with this statement that computers will replace the teachers.
There are many reasons that computers may not replace teachers but primary reason is monitoring the progress of a student. We know that our most of the children are naughty and they used to play in classroom and a computer cannot stop them to doing this. Therefore, a teacher can monitor the class with teaching the topic and also give a person touch to learner which help them to learn better. Thus, it is clear that teacher still required in a classroom.
However, technology is here to help but teacher still required for subject like painting and other arts which cannot done by computers. A painting or other art required a teacher to train student’s steps by step and sometime teacher personally help student with their personal guidance on equipment’s, this makes a weaker student helpful to learn easily with tutor guidance which a computer cannot give. In addition to this, sport required a presence of trainer to learn. Thus, it is clear the classroom still needed a tutor to teach our children.
In conclusion, it is true that use of technology helping students to study but still teacher is required in the classroom. It is clear that computers cannot completely replace teachers because of monitoring, personal guidance and for some subject it is essential. Moreover, I would suggest to encourage teachers to give best effort to train our generations.